AMHERST — The Town Council may soon take a stand against the proposed biomass power plant in Springfield.
The Amherst League of Women Voters is asking councilors to adopt a resolution at their Feb. 8 meeting protesting the wood-burning power plant being developed by Palmer Renewable Energy.
The resolution states that the opposition would be due to “the irreparable harm it would cause to the environment and human health.” It also calls for the state to not offer subsidies or other incentives to support such power plants, and for legislators to pass legislation permanently banning large-scale wood biomass power plants in Massachusetts.
Though the company has the phrase “renewable energy” in its title, the local League of Women Voters chapter is making the case that the power plant would increase pollution in the region and emit more carbon dioxide than coal burning.
League member Martha Hanner wrote in an email the resolution is important because the plant would release significant amounts of respirable particulates and potentially harm forests.
“Massachusetts is poised to become either a good example in the fight to control CO2 emissions or a very bad example,” Hanner wrote.
Endorsed unanimously by the town’s Energy and Climate Action Committee, the resolution comes as Gov. Charlie Baker has put forward regulations that would allow the plant to receive renewable energy credits.
The League’s Sustainability and Climate Action Committee wrote to the Town Council that the Springfield City Council has recently passed its own resolution condemning biomass subsidies and emphasizing the impact of the plant on their community. The resolution is also in accordance with the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.